准备下手了！！！就它了！！！

PS. Space和blogbus的关系，老婆和情人咯...

      blogbus地址：http://brianzeng.blogbus.com/

迅驰4快点出来，好让这机子降价吧！！！

Macbook的电池膨胀燃烧，很明显，是电池导致了这次爆炸着火，Macbook外壳已经融化，屏幕也已经损坏。

且这款Macbook的电池编号并不在官方召回之列。

敢买么，朋友们？

也许我敢，哇哈哈

绝望了, 还是上传到相册好了...

其中最喜欢纯粹金属/飞月/海之吼

打算去HK找找

薛锋/文

    我的一个学生和他的男朋友在相恋两年之后，于去年“五一”黄金周期间买了房子过起了未婚同居的家庭生活。然而，今年春节刚一过，我就听说他俩正在闹着要分开，因为那男方已经又有了新的女友，而且已经在另一个地方租了房子，正在进行着自己的新一轮未婚同居……

   未婚同居，真是一束美丽诱人的罂粟花。它虽然可以通往两人婚姻幸福的殿堂，但它毕竟不是两个人婚姻的正式缔结，而且距离婚姻还有一段比较远的距离。也许正因为如此，未婚同居还对于两人世界存在着不稳定的安全隐患，说不定在某一个傍晚或早晨这种未婚同居霎那间转换成未婚分居，而去大路朝天各走一边的。

   如今，年轻的男女未婚同居的现象，比起历史上的任何一个时期都要严重和普遍得多。大多数情侣在结婚之前就已经住在了一起，甚至那些根本没有打算结婚的人也因种种原因住在一起。没有契约，没有合同，也更没有相约承担的责任和义务，就这么如此简单明了地搬到一起就开始了未婚同居。

    据相关资料显示，美国在1970年时有近100万人是未婚同居，到了1990年这数字便增加到320万人，到了2000年这数字已经超过了1100万。近年来，美国的未婚同居人数还在持续增多，大有要把未婚同居进行到底的架势。据媒体报道的许多美国人对于未婚同居的态度是，“我是否要接受同居这回事，就像接受各种时尚的潮流一样？！”

    近十几年来，中国大陆的许多人们特别是一些大中城市里的青年男女，也正在逐渐地接受着未婚同居这种所谓新潮的观念和行为。其原因跟国外的人们那种时尚的追求有所不同，看起来倒也是有好多实际的因素在其中。诸如， “住在一起是为了分担经济上的负担”， “不住在一起怎么知道我们的生活习惯和性格能否合得来？”还有更多人看到了太多结婚的失败，于是就自己选择把未婚同居作为婚姻之前的一个试运行。比如，湖北武汉有位女硕士初到广州，还没有找到合适的工作，身上的积蓄也所剩无几。面对昂贵的房租，觉得和男友住在一起是很划算的事情，于是便主动要求与男友婚前同居。所以，在中国大陆的未婚同居，多是以经济利益的考虑才做出的选择。

　　虽然有些未婚同居的理由，听起来似乎合情合理，但有关的国内外科学研究数据和调查显示，未婚同居的生活却隐藏着太多地被人忽略的负面问题，需要引起人们的关注和重视。

　　一是极易导致离婚率的上升。据美国近年所作的相关资料统计显示，在美国离婚的夫妻中，75％是在结婚前有过同居生活的。另外一项对1800对已婚夫妻进行的全国性调查显明，婚前曾经同居的夫妻，离婚率是普通夫妻的离婚率的两倍。耶鲁大学的一项研究显示：在婚前有过同居行为的人，离婚率要高达80％。数据告诉我们，未婚同居会增大离婚的机率，而不是想象中的减少，因而不利于婚姻和家庭的稳定。

　　二是极易导致婚姻矛盾和情感伤害。未婚同居增加了情感伤害以及家庭暴力的危险性。国内某大学研究得出的结论是：同居生活中的侵犯行为至少是婚姻生活中的两倍，未婚同居生活比婚姻生活更容易发生争吵、咆哮以及家庭暴力行为。随着现在越来越多的未婚情侣住在一起，家庭暴力也处于上升趋势。

　　三是极易造成家庭生活的幸福度降低。据研究表明，未婚同居的男女双方的家庭生活幸福程度比不上已婚夫妻，其感情程度也要远远低于已婚夫妻之间的感情。美国权威心理健康研究院的分析结果是，未婚同居女性产生沮丧的概率是已婚女性的三倍以上，其中有近25％的人患有神经紊乱，她们比已婚女性更容易急躁、焦虑、担心，生活会更不幸福。

　　四是极易导致婚外情可能性的增加。性方面的忠诚是深受同居生活的负面影响的。如果一位女性在结婚之前和一位男性住在一起，那么在结婚之后就更有可能欺骗对方。有调查显示，已婚人群的性生活无论在数量上还是质量上都要优于单身人群，和谐幸福的程度要高出很多，为婚姻带来保障。

   五是导致双方步入婚姻殿堂的可能性减少。虽然现实中有很多未婚同居的情侣会说将来要结婚的，但实际的结果却是，其中40％以上的人都会以分手告终，最终进入婚姻殿堂的寥寥无几。所以，婚前同居实际上降低了情侣们步入婚姻的几率。

                                                         2007年3月11日

P.S. 还有你,nano2(4GB U2乐队合作红色抗爱滋病版)

Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after rollerskating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment. Within this group of people, 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots were not wearing any protective clothing (helmets,  knee pads, etc.) or any light-reflecting material (clip-on lights, glow-in-dark wrist pads, etc.). Clearly, these statistics indicate that by investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective equipment, rollerskaters will greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured in an accident.

This argument attempt to reveal a compendious causation of injuring in rollerskating, which is seemingly fundamental and proportional to a lack of self-protection, such as protective equipment and reflective material. Hence, the author concludes that rollerskaters can reduce the risk of suffering injuries in accidents by investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective material. However, the author obviously oversimplifies the relationship between the high percentage of injury and wearing no protective clothing, furthermore, the conclusion overemphasize the influence on high-quality protecting equipment and disregards some other significant factors which may also result in accidents.

First of all, there inescapably has a tremendous drawback of the statistics for the sake of lacking the base amount, which is represented as the entire population of skaters. Secondly, the selection procedure of the problematic survey merely draws its focus on the injured skaters who go to emergency room, thus a large amount of injuries, who go to private clinic or treat with themselves, may inevitably be excluded.

It is not to deny that wearing protective equipment and reflective material would virtually reduce the rate of being injured in accidents. However, the argument above fails to afford us an unequivocal definition of the severity of injuries. Skaters might be seriously injured on the ground that some specific accidents are immensely severe, even though they put on complete equipment. Moreover, some particular crowd, such as X game players, is more likely to suffer injuries on account of utmost challenging, for them protective gear almost means non-exist. Consequently numerous rollerskaters will not be enormously beneficial from investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective material, some ordinary equipment will operate similar effect as high-quality equipment do, thus skillful technique and consciousness of self-protection may be significantly more essential in stead of investing in high-qualify equipment.

Finally, there is still some other concernful factor which might relevant to accidents. First, the percentage of the accidents as mentioned above will unavoidably fluctuate in that accidents not only occur in streets or parking lots but also take place in campus, courts, parks, etc. Second, the local authorities’ attitude towards this issue is also crucial. But unfortunately, we fail to seek a clear view of whether the authorities have established an appropriate institutional strategy or not.

The author attempt to demonstrate this argumentation basically by illustrating the emergency room statistics so as to evoke us to enhance safety in rollerskating by investing a large amount of money in high-quality protective equipment. However, neither the conclusion nor the evidences and illustrations are reliability owing to the lack of integrated analysis of the phenomena which is mentioned above. After all, a synthetically mature project which is tightly corresponding to the local circumstance is profoundly needed to solute this issue.

By the way, do you guys know what GRE really stands  for? Let me tell you. GOD READING ENGLISH...